...The earliest unrecognized communitarian infections began in London when the British lost control over the American market. All aristocrats were stripped of their lands and titles after the war. All Imperial property holdings were claimed by the upstart colonials. The new virus was created to poison the concrete system that promised freedom to common born men. The "new" virus soon spread into all the "best" imperial universities in the world. Highly educated, infected social scientists designed the ways to spread the silent but deadly poison. Year after year, Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Berekley, Univeristy of Chicago, and universities around the world spread the virus to their students. Their schools spit out infected teachers, they, in their turn, spewed communitarian vomit over every student they went on to teach.
...Now I don't have a Ph.D., a Masters, or even a Bachelors degree, but I'm fairly certain the U.S. Constitution is not some vague, debatable, theory of "individualism" verus "collectivism." As far as I know, it's our national law, not our national dilemma. But even if it is a dialectical conflict, the conflict ended in 1789, and individuals won. The 1787 draft U.S. Constitution was heavily debated in the thirteen original state legislatures. Intense public debates raged between common born men in the states for two full years before it passed, but only after it included the Bill of Rights. U.S. laws, like "freedom of speech," right to bear arms," and "authority of law" were pressed on the Constitutionalists by the free men in the free former colonies. Common American people wrote the U.S. Bill of Rights.
...The main purpose for a communitarian system is to protect the economic interests of a small group of corporate elites who aim to control the global market. Communitarians suggest "ideas" for eliminating American laws that have been identified as barriers to global expansionism and a new form of nicer slavery. (The entire Bill of Rights is an "identified barrier.") Communitarians, not the Arabs, are the people who most "hate our freedoms." Their emptied brains never challenge the core communitarian idea that freedom for individuals is passe.
...While most of the American population remains buried in dialectical opposition to themselves, the communitarian agenda marches by largely unnoticed.
Read the Full Article
...Now I don't have a Ph.D., a Masters, or even a Bachelors degree, but I'm fairly certain the U.S. Constitution is not some vague, debatable, theory of "individualism" verus "collectivism." As far as I know, it's our national law, not our national dilemma. But even if it is a dialectical conflict, the conflict ended in 1789, and individuals won. The 1787 draft U.S. Constitution was heavily debated in the thirteen original state legislatures. Intense public debates raged between common born men in the states for two full years before it passed, but only after it included the Bill of Rights. U.S. laws, like "freedom of speech," right to bear arms," and "authority of law" were pressed on the Constitutionalists by the free men in the free former colonies. Common American people wrote the U.S. Bill of Rights.
...The main purpose for a communitarian system is to protect the economic interests of a small group of corporate elites who aim to control the global market. Communitarians suggest "ideas" for eliminating American laws that have been identified as barriers to global expansionism and a new form of nicer slavery. (The entire Bill of Rights is an "identified barrier.") Communitarians, not the Arabs, are the people who most "hate our freedoms." Their emptied brains never challenge the core communitarian idea that freedom for individuals is passe.
...While most of the American population remains buried in dialectical opposition to themselves, the communitarian agenda marches by largely unnoticed.
Read the Full Article
